Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) scores 1.1 points higher (38.9 vs 37.8) but costs 13× as much to run the benchmark ($1185 vs $94.1; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 37.8, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) when 37.8 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 38.9 | +2.9% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 2.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $1,184.90 | +1159.6% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 13× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 29.02s | 15.36s | −47.1% Muse Spark Open (Xhig… is 47.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 2.9% more intelligence, 1159.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 47.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark Open (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Muse Spark Open (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/muse-spark-open · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/muse-spark-open?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill