Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 33.3% less intelligence, 354.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 25.2 | −33.3% Qwen3.7 Plus is 33.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $427.73 | +354.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 4.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 28.27s | 46.15s | +63.2% Qwen3.7 Plus is 63.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill