Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) by Anthropic or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)
Solar Pro 4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (High): 29.6% less intelligence, 683.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 37.8 | 26.6 | −29.6% Solar Pro 4 is 29.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $94.07 | $736.82 | +683.3% Solar Pro 4 is 7.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.02s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (High)Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-high/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill