Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Terra (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 14.4 points higher (43.9 vs 29.5) but costs 7.0× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $34.3; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Terra (High) when you need intelligence above 29.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) when 29.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | GPT-6.1 Terra (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 43.9 | +48.8% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 48.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $238.53 | +595.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 7.0× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 11.16s | −2.5% GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is 2.5% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 48.8% more intelligence, 595.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 2.5% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)GPT-6.1 Terra (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-6-1-terra-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/gpt-6-1-terra-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill