Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs MiMo-V2.5
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)
MiMo-V2.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 26.1% less intelligence, 80.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 483.4% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | MiMo-V2.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 21.8 | −26.1% MiMo-V2.5 is 26.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $61.93 | +80.5% MiMo-V2.5 is 80.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 66.80s | +483.4% MiMo-V2.5 is 483.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.13 / $0.27 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- MiMo-V2.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 34.50 for $56.4.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)MiMo-V2.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/mimo-v2-5-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/mimo-v2-5-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill