Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 56.9% less intelligence, 580.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 88.9% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 12.7 | −56.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 56.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $233.56 | +580.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.45s | 21.63s | +88.9% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 88.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill