Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Qwen3.7 Plus by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)
Qwen3.7 Plus vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 14.6% less intelligence, 1146.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 314.6% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Qwen3.7 Plus | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 25.2 | −14.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 14.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $427.73 | +1146.7% Qwen3.7 Plus is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.13s | 46.15s | +314.6% Qwen3.7 Plus is 314.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.40 / $1.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Qwen3.7 PlusToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/qwen3-7-plus · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/qwen3-7-plus?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill