Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) by Anthropic or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)
Trinity Large Thinking vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low): 63.4% less intelligence, 579.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 14.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.5 | 10.8 | −63.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 63.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $34.31 | $232.95 | +579.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 6.8× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 9.59s | 8.25s | −14.0% Trinity Large Thinking is 14.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Low)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-low/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill