Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)
Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 53.3% less intelligence, 1360.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 113.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Gemini 2.5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 16.1 | −53.3% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 53.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $822.85 | +1360.0% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 15× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.10s | 27.94s | +113.3% Gemini 2.5 Pro is 113.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 2.5 Pro is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Gemini 2.5 ProToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gemini-2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gemini-2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill