Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Gemini 4 Carbon (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Gemini 4 Carbon (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-29.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) scores 34.8 points higher (59.4 vs 24.6) but costs 113× as much to run the benchmark ($8240 vs $72.7; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 4 Carbon (High) when you need intelligence above 24.6, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 24.6 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Gemini 4 Carbon (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.6 | 59.4 | +141.5% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 2.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $72.70 | $8,239.69 | +11233.8% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 113× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.90s | 105.19s | +783.9% Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is 783.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 4 Carbon (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 141.5% more intelligence, 11233.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 783.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 4 Carbon (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Gemini 4 Carbon (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gemini-4-carbon · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gemini-4-carbon?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill