Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 16.5 points higher (51.0 vs 34.5) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $56.4; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 51.0 | +47.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 47.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $662.28 | +1075.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 12× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.74s | 143.74s | +875.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 875.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 47.8% more intelligence, 1075.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 875.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill