Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Llama 4 Maverick
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Llama 4 Maverick by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) scores 25.2 points higher (34.5 vs 9.3) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($56.4 vs $44.0; mid-range vs budget cost classes). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Llama 4 Maverick.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Llama 4 Maverick | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 9.3 | −73.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 73.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $43.98 | −22.0% Llama 4 Maverick is 22.0% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 11.18s | +7.4% Llama 4 Maverick is 7.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.92 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Llama 4 Maverick vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 73.0% less intelligence, 22.0% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 7.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Llama 4 Maverick is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Llama 4 MaverickToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/llama-4-maverick · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/llama-4-maverick?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill