Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 49.3% less intelligence, 158.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 17.5 | −49.3% Muse Glimmer (High) is 49.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $145.77 | +158.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 2.6× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 13.12s | 25.25s | +92.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 92.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill