Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) by Anthropic or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 5.1 points higher (39.6 vs 34.5) but costs 25× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $56.4; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 34.5, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) when 34.5 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.5 | 39.6 | +14.8% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 14.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $56.36 | $1,385.40 | +2358.1% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 25× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.41s | 20.85s | +100.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 100.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium): 14.8% more intelligence, 2358.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 100.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Medium)Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-medium/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill