Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 25.6 points higher (41.2 vs 15.6) but costs 1.0× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $156; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 15.6 | −62.1% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 62.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $155.87 | −1.1% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 1.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 69.98s | 6.10s | −91.3% Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 91.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 62.1% less intelligence, 1.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 91.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Gemini 3.1 Flash-LiteToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/gemini-3-1-flash-lite-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill