Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Ling 3.0 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)On the frontier
Intelligence
41.20
Total cost
$158
InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Ling 3.0 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)41.220.1−51.2% Ling 3.0 Flash is 51.2% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$157.58Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)68.29s12.81s−81.2% Ling 3.0 Flash is 81.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.10 / $0.50$0.07 / $0.22
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): what beats itLing 3.0 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill