Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 5.1 points higher (46.3 vs 41.2) but costs 1.3× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $158; both mid-range class). Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 46.3 | +12.4% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 12.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $206.66 | +31.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 31.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.82s | 48.29s | −19.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 19.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 12.4% more intelligence, 31.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 19.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill