Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Mistral Large 3
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Mistral Large 3 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 31.9 points higher (41.2 vs 9.3) but costs 3.4× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $46.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.3, and Mistral Large 3 when 9.3 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Mistral Large 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 9.3 | −77.4% Mistral Large 3 is 77.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $46.41 | −70.5% Mistral Large 3 is 70.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 68.29s | 6.94s | −89.8% Mistral Large 3 is 89.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.50 / $1.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Mistral Large 3 vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 77.4% less intelligence, 70.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Mistral Large 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Mistral Large 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/mistral-large-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/mistral-large-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill