Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 23.7 points higher (41.2 vs 17.5) but costs 1.1× as much to run the benchmark ($158 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 17.5 | −57.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 57.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $145.77 | −7.5% Muse Glimmer (High) is 7.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.82s | 24.76s | −58.6% Muse Glimmer (High) is 58.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 57.5% less intelligence, 7.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 58.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill