Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 35.7% less intelligence, 81.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 89.4% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 26.5 | −35.7% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 35.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $286.07 | +81.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 81.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 59.82s | 6.35s | −89.4% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 89.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill