Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 Max
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Qwen3.8 Max by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)
Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh): 2.4% less intelligence, 1913.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.0% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) | Qwen3.8 Max | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 41.2 | 40.2 | −2.4% Qwen3.8 Max is 2.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $157.58 | $3,172.37 | +1913.2% Qwen3.8 Max is 20× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 73.93s | 62.08s | −16.0% Qwen3.8 Max is 16.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
- Qwen3.8 Max is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh)Qwen3.8 MaxToday's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/qwen3-8-max-0803 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5-xhigh/qwen3-8-max-0803?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill