Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) scores 0.6 points higher (44.0 vs 43.4) but costs 6.3× as much to run the benchmark ($2082 vs $330; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 43.4, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when 43.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 44.0 | +1.4% GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is 1.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $2,082.28 | +530.5% GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is 6.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 360.06s | 62.25s | −82.7% GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is 82.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $4.00 / $20.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 1.4% more intelligence, 530.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 82.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-5-6-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill