Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs GPT-6 Astra (Max)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or GPT-6 Astra (Max) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6 Astra (Max) scores 9.3 points higher (52.7 vs 43.4) but costs 16× as much to run the benchmark ($5324 vs $330; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick GPT-6 Astra (Max) when you need intelligence above 43.4, and Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when 43.4 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | GPT-6 Astra (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 52.7 | +21.4% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 21.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $5,324.10 | +1512.1% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 16× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 354.68s | 388.52s | +9.5% GPT-6 Astra (Max) is 9.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $10.0 / $50.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6 Astra (Max) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 21.4% more intelligence, 1512.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 9.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-6 Astra (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)GPT-6 Astra (Max)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-astra · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/gpt-6-astra?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill