Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Muse Glimmer (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Muse Glimmer (High) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 25.9 points higher (43.4 vs 17.5) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $146; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Muse Glimmer (High).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Muse Glimmer (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 17.5 | −59.7% Muse Glimmer (High) is 59.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $145.77 | −55.9% Muse Glimmer (High) is 55.9% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.47s | 25.25s | −92.1% Muse Glimmer (High) is 92.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Muse Glimmer (High) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 59.7% less intelligence, 55.9% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 92.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Muse Glimmer (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Muse Glimmer (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/muse-glimmer · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/muse-glimmer?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill