Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 30.7 points higher (43.4 vs 12.7) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $234; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning).
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 12.7 | −70.7% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 70.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $233.56 | −29.3% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 29.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 354.68s | 22.73s | −93.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 93.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 70.7% less intelligence, 29.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 93.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill