Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) vs Trinity Large Thinking
Which is better for the money: Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) by Anthropic or Trinity Large Thinking by Arcee AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) scores 32.6 points higher (43.4 vs 10.8) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($330 vs $233; both mid-range class). Pick Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Trinity Large Thinking.
| Metric | Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) | Trinity Large Thinking | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 43.4 | 10.8 | −75.1% Trinity Large Thinking is 75.1% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $330.25 | $232.95 | −29.5% Trinity Large Thinking is 29.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 318.48s | 8.25s | −97.4% Trinity Large Thinking is 97.4% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.10 / $0.50 | $0.25 / $0.80 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Trinity Large Thinking vs Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max): 75.1% less intelligence, 29.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 97.4% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Trinity Large Thinking is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Haiku 5.5 (Max)Trinity Large ThinkingToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/trinity-large-thinking · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-haiku-5-5/trinity-large-thinking?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill