Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.1 | 39.5 | +35.7% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 35.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $671.96 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.17s | 15.00s | −37.9% DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (… is 37.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.29 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/deepseek-v4-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/deepseek-v4-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill