Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.1 | 14.9 | −48.8% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 48.8% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 24.17s | 19.63s | −18.8% GLM-4.6 (Non-reasonin… is 18.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.57 / $2.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/glm-4-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/glm-4-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill