Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.1 | 34.6 | +18.9% GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is 18.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $179.33 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 22.66s | 45.80s | +102.1% GPT-5.6 Luna (Xhigh) is 102.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/gpt-5-6-luna-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill