Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.1 | 55.1 | +89.3% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 89.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $3,117.31 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.23s | 46.58s | +100.5% Kimi K3.1 Pro is 100.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/kimi-k3-1-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/kimi-k3-1-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill