Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.0 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
29.10
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)Ling 3.0 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)29.120.1−30.9% Ling 3.0 Flash is 30.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)24.17s10.53s−56.4% Ling 3.0 Flash is 56.4% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.07 / $0.22
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning): what beats itLing 3.0 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill