Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Ling 3.1 Flash 1019. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.1 | 43.9 | +50.9% Ling 3.1 Flash 1019 is 50.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,551.81 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 23.23s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.30 / $0.90 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/ling-3-1-flash-1019 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/ling-3-1-flash-1019?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill