Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 Coder Next. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) | Qwen3 Coder Next | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 29.1 | 9.2 | −68.4% Qwen3 Coder Next is 68.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $405.10 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 25.65s | 6.44s | −74.9% Qwen3 Coder Next is 74.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.31 / $1.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/qwen3-coder-next · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5-thinking/qwen3-coder-next?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill