Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 13.1 | −44.7% DeepSeek R1 0528 (May… is 44.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.40s | 77.71s | +581.7% DeepSeek R1 0528 (May… is 581.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.85 / $2.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/deepseek-r1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/deepseek-r1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill