Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct

Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 3n E2B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.70
Total cost
-
GoogleGemma 3n E2B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
4.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Gemma 3n E2B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.74.8−79.7% Gemma 3n E2B Instruct is 79.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.53sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.00 / $0.00
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGemma 3n E2B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/gemma-3n-e2b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/gemma-3n-e2b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill