Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 16.7 | −29.5% Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reas… is 29.5% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.32s | 28.38s | +150.7% Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reas… is 150.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.10 / $0.34 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/gemma-4-26b-a4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/gemma-4-26b-a4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill