Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 10.6 | −55.3% GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-re… is 55.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.16s | 6.25s | −44.0% GLM-4.7-Flash (Non-re… is 44.0% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.07 / $0.40 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-4-7-flash-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill