Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.1 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 26.1 | +10.1% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 10.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,486.78 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.53s | 63.24s | +448.5% GLM-5.1 (Reasoning) is 448.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.28 / $4.07 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-5-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-5-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill