Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max)

Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.2 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.70
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
33.70
Total cost
$2097
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.2 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.733.7+42.2% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 42.2% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,097.29— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.40s29.25s+156.6% GLM-5.2 (Max) is 156.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-5-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-5-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill