Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Max)

Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GLM-5.3 (Max). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.70
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3 (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
44.80
Total cost
$2503
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)GLM-5.3 (Max)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.744.8+89.0% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 89.0% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$2,503.48— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.40s28.79s+152.5% GLM-5.3 (Max) is 152.5% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itGLM-5.3 (Max): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-5-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/glm-5-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill