Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 36.2 | +52.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 52.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $114.52 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 10.46s | 6.78s | −35.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 35.2% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill