Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh)

Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Inkling (Xhigh). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.70
Total cost
-
Thinking MachinesInkling (Xhigh)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
25.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Inkling (Xhigh)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.725.0+5.5% Inkling (Xhigh) is 5.5% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.53s14.41s+25.0% Inkling (Xhigh) is 25.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.00 / $4.05
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Speech
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itInkling (Xhigh): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/inkling · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/inkling?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill