Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 27.0 | +13.9% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 13.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $1,528.20 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.53s | 65.20s | +465.5% Kimi K2.6 (Reasoning) is 465.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | $0.95 / $4.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Video |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/kimi-k2-6 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/kimi-k2-6?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill