Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision)
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) | Llama 3.2 Instruct 90B (Vision) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 23.7 | 6.4 | −73.0% Llama 3.2 Instruct 90… is 73.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | Not reported | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.53s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $5.00 / $25.0 | — | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/llama-3-2-instruct-90b-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/llama-3-2-instruct-90b-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill