Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.70
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Phi-4 Mini InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.76.3−73.4% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 73.4% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.53s11.81s+2.4% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 2.4% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.07 / $0.30
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/phi-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/phi-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill