Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Sarvam 105B (High)

Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) vs Sarvam 105B (High). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
23.70
Total cost
-
SarvamSarvam 105B (High)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
8.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)Sarvam 105B (High)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)23.78.8−62.9% Sarvam 105B (High) is 62.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)11.40s14.46s+26.8% Sarvam 105B (High) is 26.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.04 / $0.17
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): what beats itSarvam 105B (High): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/sarvam-105b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-5/sarvam-105b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill