Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
31.90
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)31.913.1−58.9% DeepSeek R1 0528 (May… is 58.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)29.02s79.77s+174.9% DeepSeek R1 0528 (May… is 174.9% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.85 / $2.75
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Max): what beats itDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/deepseek-r1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/deepseek-r1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill