Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
31.90
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.40
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)GLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)31.922.4−29.8% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 29.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)37.72s3.84s−89.8% GLM-5.2 (Non-reasonin… is 89.8% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Max): what beats itGLM-5.2 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/glm-5-2-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/glm-5-2-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill