Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs GPT-5 nano (Minimal)

Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs GPT-5 nano (Minimal). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
31.90
Total cost
-
OpenAIGPT-5 nano (Minimal)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)GPT-5 nano (Minimal)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)31.97.1−77.7% GPT-5 nano (Minimal) is 77.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)38.11s4.19s−89.0% GPT-5 nano (Minimal) is 89.0% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.05 / $0.40
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Max): what beats itGPT-5 nano (Minimal): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/gpt-5-nano-minimal · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/gpt-5-nano-minimal?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill