Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B

Claude Opus 4.6 (Max) vs Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
31.90
Total cost
-
AlibabaQwen2.5 Instruct 72BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricClaude Opus 4.6 (Max)Qwen2.5 Instruct 72BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)31.97.7−75.9% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 75.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)28.81s22.71s−21.2% Qwen2.5 Instruct 72B is 21.2% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$5.00 / $25.0$0.47 / $0.49
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerClaude Opus 4.6 (Max): what beats itQwen2.5 Instruct 72B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/qwen2-5-72b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-opus-4-6-adaptive/qwen2-5-72b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill